Energy Crops Forum
Summer 1996
U.S. Department of Energy
Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program at
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Energy Crops Forum was published periodically by the Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC., for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725.

line

Table of Contents

line

Editor's Note

The Biofuels Feedstock Development Program (BFDP) is a mission-oriented program of research and analysis whose goal is to develop environmentally acceptable crops and cropping systems for producing large quantities of low-cost, high-quality biomass feedstocks. Major funding comes from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Transportation Technologies with additional funding from the Office of Utility Technologies and the Office of Industrial Technologies. This issue of Energy Crops Forum highlights the cooperative nature of several of the research efforts.


Virtual Crop Development Center Knows No Boundaries

Sheryl Martin and Jerry Tuskan
BFDP

Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) is one of the native poplars of the Southeast. When properly managed, it outproduces all other southeastern tree species. These trees perform best on deep, fertile sand-loam to clay- loam soil with high water-holding capacity. On such sites and under proper management, cottonwood reaches a height of 30 feet in 5 years, becoming reproductively mature in 6 to 10 years. Currently, however, we lack well- tested, broadly adapted clones suitable for short-rotation production.

How do you quickly and efficiently develop superior cottonwood clones that are resistant to disease and perform well across most of the Southeast? BFDP decided that the most effective way would be a "virtual crop development center" that coordinated and united the efforts of experts from institutions across the region.

Dr. Sam Land, Jr., Mississippi State University (MSU), and his co-investigators, Dr. Mike Stine, Louisiana State University and Dr. Donald Rockwood, University of Florida, have created just such an initiative for BFDP. Their "virtual crop development center" includes a host of cooperators across 13 southeastern states—Boise Cascade Corporation (Louisiana), Champion International Company (Florida), Northwest Florida Water Management District, Crown Vantage (Mississippi), International Paper Company (Georgia), Neal Land and Timber Company (Florida), Packaging Corporation of America (Tennessee), Tennessee Division of Forestry, Union Camp Corporation (Georgia), and Westvaco (Kentucky and South Carolina). Their goal is to develop eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) clones suitable for short-rotation woody crops in the Southeast.

How do you coordinate the efforts of this many people? "Frantically," says Land. The cooperators locate natural stands, obtain flowers and seeds, and provide and maintain test sites. Sites for collecting flowers and seeds stands have already been located throughout the Southeast, and new test sites are being prepared in west Tennessee, Alabama, northwest Florida, and South Carolina. Cottonwood flowers are pollinated and the seed is dispersed in a short time period, typically within 3 or 4 weeks. Seed must be collected prior to seed shedding so that its origin is known. Spring is also the only time to collect limbs containing flowers and to bring these limbs back to the laboratory to make controlled crosses.

When a cooperator reports trees are in flower or that seeds are mature, everyone must be ready to move. Land contacts his assistants, who are often far away from MSU. He puts those assistants in touch with the cooperating institution's field people to coordinate the collection of new material. The field workers also collect leaf tissue for biotechnology studies at Louisiana State University.

The work does not end there. Summers are spent maintaining a breeding orchard. In the winters, cuttings of the selected genotypes from the nursery are prepared. Throughout the year, everyone is on the lookout for new cottonwood stands.

Not just any cottonwood will do. Selections are based on relative growth, apparent disease resistance, and wood specific gravity. The goal is to collect plant material from a total of 24 areas, four areas in each of six subregions across the Southeast. The areas coverdifferent river systems and different parts of river systems and include river bottom lands and upland stream sites. After selection and collection are completed, the researchers cross- pollinate selected plants to develop new clones that are genetically suitable for short-rotation woody crops in the Southeast.

Mississippi State University's Delta Research and Extension Center is the hub of the cottonwood development effort. This facility was previously used in the 1960s and 1970 by the U.S. Forest Service for cottonwood selection and improvement. The University of Florida's contribution includes the establishment and maintenance of a test site and nursery near Tallahassee, Florida. The industrial cooperators are providing additional test sites. Louisiana State University will use the leaves collected during seed sampling to construct gene maps consisting of DNA markers. Relating these markers to traits of commercial interest, such as growth rate or disease resistance, will permit early identification of desired traits in offspring, eliminating a long wait for plants to exhibit superior performance.

Through modern technology and old-fashioned cooperation, the process of tree improvement, one of the oldest procedures in forestry, is being done faster and more efficiently by Land and his collaborators across the Southeast in BFDP's new "virtual crop development center.


Poplar Molecular Genetics Cooperative

Toby Bradshaw
University of Washington

As intensive culture of Populus species and hybrids becomes increasingly important as a source of fiber and fuel, breeding strategies must be developed and implemented to measure, capture, recombine, and fully exploit the abundant genetic variation still found in natural populations of poplars and cottonwoods. Adaptation of poplars to the specialized needs of industry is still in its earliest stages and must take advantage of the best genetic methods available if rapid, sustained genetic improvement is to be made.

Since 1989, molecular genetic investigations into the basis of Populus stem growth, form, stress tolerance, and disease resistance have pinpointed regions of the Populus genome that have significant effects on these traits. In collaboration with tree physiologists, anatomists, biochemists, and pathologists, we are at the threshold of a new era in poplar breeding in which these few key regions of the genome may be manipulated efficiently and then recombined into novel hybrids with the best characteristics of several Populus species.

The time is right to capitalize on the insights into poplar breeding that molecular biology offers. Significant gains can then be expected in both the near and longer term. For "molecular breeding" to flourish, however, critical research needs must be addressed. Informative genetic material must be identified, collected, bred, and tested over a wide range of actual and potential growing areas. Although previous clonal testing and breeding have offered useful guidelines, new research will expand the scale of breeding and testing while increasing their pace and precision through the use of molecular tools.

Data gathering, storage, retrieval, and analysis must be coordinated to ensure rapid dissemination of useful information. Stability and continuity of funding are required to permit the development of highly informative multigeneration pedigrees within a large mating design, to explore alternative breeding strategies, and to retain key personnel. At the same time, immediate and continued production of clones with potential commercial use is needed.

Each of these research needs will require extensive collaborative efforts on the part of industry, government, and academic institutions. In order to coordinate research efforts among these organizations, the Poplar Molecular Genetics Cooperative (PMGC) was formed in March, 1995. PMGC's goals are to increase understanding of the molecular genetic mechanisms causing variation in productivity and quality traits in hybrid poplar and to use research results to accelerate progress in poplar breeding.

The key to sustained genetic improvement in Populus is a detailed understanding of the genetic architecture of important phenotypic traits (e.g., stem volume, wood quality, disease resistance). Such an understanding will accelerate progress in breeding by providing improved methods to identify superior clones for immediate commercial use and parents for the next generation of hybrids. Crucial questions to be addressed include:

  • Which regions of the Populus genome contribute to heterosis (hybrid vigor) in interspecific hybrids?
  • Which regions of the genome are responsible for variation in clonal performance and breeding value?
  • Is clonal performance a good predictor of breeding value?
  • What useful traits do each of several Populus species bring to their hybrid offspring?
  • How can clones be genetically tailored to match specific sites and silvicultural regimes, as well as manufacturing processes and products?
  • Which breeding and selection system(s) will maximize genetic gain in the near and long terms?

These questions have no simple or obvious answers, but with molecular tools they are now approachable in a reasonable time frame.

In the first year of PMGC's existence, breeding methods suitable for handling large numbers of crosses were developed and implemented. Especially significant were techniques that enabled researchers to isolate female branches from unwanted pollen and to rescue immature embryos by in vitro culture. More than 1800 new hybrid seedlings were planted at the Washington State University Farm 5 in Puyallup, Washington. The industry demand for new genetic material was very strong; more than 10,000 cuttings were requested from the first-year PMGC seedlings for immediate placement in company-sponsored clonal performance trials.

PMGC members support the cooperative with annual dues of $12,500 and with in-kind contributions of land, equipment, personnel, and expertise. PMGC is also working with nonmembers who provide additional breeding materials and technical advice and support. Thus, monies from DOE and BFDP are leveraged significantly by industry and academic institutions around the world. The current PMGC membership includes Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries; Boise Cascade Corporation; Georgia-Pacific West, Inc.; Inland Empire Paper Company; James River Corporation; MacMillan Bloedel Timberlands, Inc.; Nippon Paper Industries Company, Ltd.; Potlatch Corporation; Scott Paper, Ltd.; Union Camp Corporation; Weyerhaeuser Company; British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Branch; Washington State University; the University of Washington; and, of course, DOE and BFDP.

For additional information, contact Toby Bradshaw at the Center for Urban Horticulture, Box 354115, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4115, (206) 616-1796 (voice), (206) 616-1826 (FAX), or toby@u.washington.edu (email).


Switchgrass Molecular Markers Research

Lee Gunter, Jerry Tuskan, and Stan Wullschleger
BFDP

Crop breeders have long sought to identify genetically controlled traits that are associated with superior plant growth and dependable productivity and that can be used as indicators in the selection of higher yielding cultivars. Unlike many forage and cereal crops, which have been in domestication for centuries, relatively little is known about the genetics of switchgrass, BFDP's model herbaceous energy crop. Such a deficiency makes development of superior cultivars difficult. Across its wide native geographic range, switchgrass has evolved into upland and lowland ecotypes (locally adapted populations) that vary in morphology and physiology. The considerable variation in switchgrass will provide plant breeders with the means to increase biomass yields.

BFDP hopes to simplify the assessment of switchgrass germplasm by using a technique that reveals variation in randomly distributed genomic DNA segments. It is now possible for geneticists and breeders to routinely extract DNA from small amounts of leaf tissue and make many copies using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a process that mimics the enzymatic amplification of DNA within a single cell. These amplified segments can serve as markers for attributes such as disease resistance or drought tolerance that may not be apparent at the seedling stage. In such cases, the marker is assumed to be genetically linked to the trait. Often, however, these PCR-based markers (known as random amplified polymorphic DNA or RAPD markers) act as simple genetic "fingerprints" and are useful tools to enhance our ability to perceive differences between very similar individuals, cultivars, varieties, or breeding lines.

One of the conditions that makes successful switchgrass breeding difficult is variation in chromosome numbers, because reliable inheritance of genetically-controlled traits is based on stable chromosome arrangements across generations. Switchgrass ecotypes are known to have multiple copies of a basic chromosome number: typically 4X in lowlands and 6X to 8X in uplands, according to observations made by Charles Taliaferro and Andy Hopkins at Oklahoma State University1.

Our first objective was to search for markers that could be used to differentiate switchgrass cultivars on the basis of chromosome number or ecotype. Using RAPD primers in the PCR amplification process, we detected a single marker in plants with higher chromosome numbers2. The marker is present in 8X cultivars (e.g., 'Shelter' and 'Trailblazer') but is absent from 4X cultivars (e.g., 'Alamo' and 'Kanlow'). This finding is in accord with the work of University of Nebraska agronomist Ken Vogel, who developed markers that distinguish 4X and 8X cultivars based on chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs3). We anticipate that these research results will enable breeders to make a quick assessment of native germ plasm collections for potential genetic compatibility without resorting to labor-intensive chromosome counts.

Because chromosome number is not an absolute predictor of ecotype in switchgrass, we are assembling a set of diagnostic markers for estimating relationships between new germ plasm and released cultivars by comparing standard morphological descriptors to molecular markers. While both diagnostic markers and morphological descriptors are useful, preliminary evidence suggests that molecular markers, which are more abundant, are better predictors when cultivars are morphologically similar. The ability to make such distinctions will facilitate the organization of switchgrass germ plasm breeding populations.

The use of molecular markers in switchgrass research seems promising. We hope the application of these methods and others will encourage collaboration among researchers to increase our understanding of switchgrass biology, thus overcoming obstacles in the development of superior cultivars.

References

  1. A.A. Hopkins and C.M. Taliaferro. Chromosome number and nuclear DNA content of several switchgrass populations. Crop Science (in press).
  2. L.E. Gunter, G.A. Tuskan, and S.D. Wullschleger. 1996. Diversity among populations of switchgrass based on RAPD markers. Crop Science 36:1017–1022.
  3. S.J. Hultquist, K.P. Vogel, D.J. Lee, K. Arumuganathan, and S. Kaeppler. 1996. Chloroplast DNA and nuclear DNA content variations among cultivars of switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. Crop Science 36:1049–1052.

Recent Publications

  1. Anderson, I.C., D.R. Buxton, and J.A. Hallam. 1996. Selection of Herbaceous Energy Crops for the Western Corn Belt. Final Report Part I: Agronomic Aspects. ORNL/Sub/88-SC264/P1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  2. Anderson, I.C., D.R. Buxton, and J.A. Hallam. 1996. Selection of Herbaceous Energy Crops for the Western Corn Belt. Final Report Part II: Economic Potentials. ORNL/Sub/88-SC264/P2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  3. Bongarten, B.C., and S.A. Merkle. 1996. Optimizing Energy Yields in Black Locust Through Genetic Selection: Final Report September 30, 1994. ORNL/Sub/86-95907/4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  4. Dickmann, D.I., K.S. Pregitzer, and P.V. Nguyen. 1996. Net Assimilation and Photosynthate Allocation of Populus Clones Grown under Short-Rotation Intensive Culture: Physiological and Genetic Responses Regulating Yield. ORNL/Sub/86-95903/4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  5. Meyer, D.W., W.E. Norby, D.O. Erickson, and R.G. Johnson. 1996. Evaluation of Herbaceous Biomass Crops in the Northern Great Plains: Final Report August 31, 1994. ORNL/Sub/88-SB844/2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  6. Stettler, R.F., T.M. Hinckley, H.D. Bradshaw, Jr., and P.E. Heilman. 1996. Genetic Improvement and Evaluation of Black Cottonwood for Short-Rotation Biomass Production: Final Report 1987 to 1992. ORNL/Sub/83-43382/8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.